Librarians using the information literacy framework in discipline-specific settings should consider how each frame relates to national standards for students and professionals. In each box below, connections are made between the "Authority is Constructed and Contextual" frame and the discipline of psychology as it relates to education and professional practice.
The following statements broadly connect the "Authority is Constructed and Contextual" frame to psychology education. Psychology students can learn about authority through coursework, research, insights from clients or professional colleagues, and their own professional experiences. To expand on these:
Authority through coursework and research literature: Students learn about the scientific research process through evidence-based, peer-reviewed literature. Students should recognize that, though peer reviewed content is often favored, there are systemic inequalities in the scholarly landscape and inherent biases that reinforce established knowledge and worldviews.
Authority of clients’ or colleagues’ experiences: A person’s worldview, gender, sexual orientation, and cultural orientation, for example, grants them authority in their personal experience.
Authority through professional work: Authority is gained through professional experience or practice. This could include credentialing, licensure, advanced degrees, continuing education, publications, professional experience etc.
Students demonstrate comprehension of the major concepts, theoretical perspectives, historical trends, and empirical or evidence-based findings to discuss how psychological principles apply to behavior and mental processes. Students should consider different types of authority, such as subject expertise, societal position, or special experience when applying psychological principles in an evidence-based manner. Students should also consider how sources of authority and what is considered "evidence-based" have changed over time.
1.1 Describe key concepts, principles, and theories in psychological science
1.1C Explain how research conclusions may be affected by sociocultural context
1.2 Develop a working knowledge of psychology’s major subfields
1.2a Describe psychology’s major subfields
1.2A Compare and contrast psychology’s major subfields
1.3 Portray significant aspects of the history of psychological science
1.3A Justify preferences for different theoretical orientations in psychological science based on perceived advantages and limitations
1.3C Explain how historical context has affected which contributions made by psychologists were deemed influential
1.5 Provide examples of psychology’s integrative themes
1.5A Discuss the contributions that integrative themes make to the understanding and impact of psychological science
1.5B. Psychological science explains general principles that govern behavior while recognizing individual differences
1.5C. Psychological, biological, social, and cultural factors influence behavior and mental processes
1.5D. Psychological science values diversity, promotes equity, and fosters inclusion in pursuit of a more just society
1.5E. Our perceptions and biases filter our experiences of the world through an imperfect personal lens.
The skills in this domain involve the development of scientific reasoning and investigation, including developing proficiencies in research methods and statistics. Research skills reflect having knowledge and respect for diversity-related issues when targeting samples in study design and data analysis. Research practice also includes an evaluation of the extent to which research findings can be generalized as applicable to groups beyond the research sample.
2.1 Exercise scientific reasoning to investigate psychological phenomena
2.1b Recognize the potential for flaws in behavioral explanations that are based on anecdotes or pseudoscience
2.1c Describe common fallacies in thinking (e.g., confirmation bias, post hoc explanations, implying causation from correlation) that potentially impair accurate research conclusions and predictions
2.3 Incorporate sociocultural factors in scientific research practices
2.3a Recognize that research emerges from the researcher’s value system and worldview.
2.3A Identify examples of how a researcher’s value system, sociocultural characteristics, and historical context influence the development of scientific inquiry
2.3b identify potential limitations in research studies that do not appropriately consider the role of sociocultural influences
2.3B Incorporate appropriate sociocultural considerations in research design and interpretation
2.3d Recognize that the focus of psychological research may narrowly reflect western concerns and biases
2.3D Incorporate international sources, including non western researchers and samples, in research processes, where appropriate
2.3e Describe how qualitative research captures varied human experiences, particularly those of members from historically marginalized groups
2.3E Evaluate how qualitative research strategies address equity, diversity, and inclusion considerations
This goal promotes the development of ethical and socially responsible values and behaviors in personal, professional, organizational, and institutional settings. The goal includes ethical reasoning and practices, interpersonal and intercultural responsiveness, as well as strategies that promote and sustain strong communities and equitable opportunities.
3.2 Develop and practice interpersonal and intercultural responsiveness
3.2A Articulate the value of and seek opportunities to interact respectfully with people of diverse abilities, backgrounds, nationalities, and cultural perspectives
Students develop psychological literacy, including applying knowledge of research skills necessary to be an informed consumer of research or a critic regarding unsupported claims about behavior. The skills in this category address the ability of students to build and maintain effective communication skills in processing and expressing information.
4.2 Write and present effectively for different purposes
4.2a Recognize communication content and form differ based on purpose
4.2E Use inclusive language and examples in communication projects to optimize audience understanding and engagement
4.3 Provide evidence of psychological literacy
4.3b Identify how information sources differ in credibility and objectivity, favoring expert, peer-reviewed scholarship
4.3C Evaluate psychological information based on the currency, reliability, validity, and generalizability of sources
4.3d Describe the types of biases or errors that appear in various media
4.4 Exhibit appropriate technological skills to improve communication
4.4C Develop comprehensive and efficient strategies for locating and using relevant scholarship to investigate psychological questions
The emphasis in this domain involves self-regulation, project management skills, professional judgment, collaboration skills, and proficiency in workplace technology and career planning. Students recognize that oneself may also be an authority in certain areas.
5.3 Display effective judgment in professional interactions
5.3A Accept and adapt to interaction complexity in professional, cultural, and academic contexts
5.4 Cultivate workforce collaboration skills
5.4B Incorporate diverse perspectives to maximize collaboration effectiveness and problem-solving
5.4f Identify potential personal biases that can influence professional judgment
The following statements broadly connect the "Authority is Constructed" frame to the professional practice of psychology.
In the professional practice of psychology, "Authority is Constructed and Contextual" is exemplified in multiple ways.
Principle B: Fidelity and Responsibility
Principle C: Integrity
Principle D: Justice
Principle E: Respect for People's Rights and Dignity
Section 2: Competence
Psychologists undertake ongoing efforts to develop and maintain their competence.
Responsibility of the Individual Psychologist
Principle I: Respect for the Dignity of Persons and Peoples
Principle II: Responsible Caring
Principle III: Integrity in Relationships
Principle IV: Responsibility to Society
Although this list is not comprehensive, it provides a sample set of learning objectives and activities that can be used to teach students about how the "Authority is Constructed and Contextual" frame informs the psychology discipline. Librarians should adapt or modify these sample objectives and activities to meet the needs of their students (e.g., undergraduate vs. graduate).
1. Learning Objective: Students will identify appropriate resources by understanding the role of authoritative voices in psychology.
2. Learning Objective: Students will understand the role of context in selecting different types of authoritative information for different information needs.
3. Learning Objective: Students will examine sub-disciplines within psychology and identify what kinds of jobs are available for different degrees in psychology (e.g., associates, bachelor's, master's, doctorate-PsyD or PhD) in order to learn how authority is contextual.
4. Learning Objective: Psychology students will discuss how personal biases impact existing research/evidence in psychology.
5. Learning Objective: Students will consider patient preferences, cultural context, etc. during practice scenarios in order to acknowledge the patient's authority in the decision-making process.
Bellamy, Liz . "Whose Shoulders Are You Standing On? Inclusive Citation Practices in Literature Reviews." CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2020. https://projectcora.org/assignment/whose-shoulders-are-you-standing-inclusive-citation-practices-literature-reviews
Chenevey, L. (2023). Teaching the politics of citation: Challenging students’ perceptions. College & Research Libraries News, 84(5), 152. doi:https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.84.5.152