Skip to Main Content

ACRL/EBSS Psychology Committee

This guide is designed to provide new and experienced psychology librarians with basic information about services and resources commonly provided by psychology librarians in the academic setting.

Articles of Interest

Chapman, K. (2021, May 21). Characteristics of systematic reviews in the Social Sciences. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102396

Dalton, M. (2019). How individual consultations with a librarian can support systematic reviews in the social sciences. Journal Of Information Literacy, 13(2), 163-172. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=EJ1300356&id=EJ1300356

Grant, M.J., Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26: 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Kocher, M., & Riegelman, A. (2018). Systematic reviews and evidence synthesis: Resources beyond the health sciences. College & Research Libraries News, 79(5), 248. doi:https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.79.5.248

Kogut, A., Ramirez, D., & Foster, M. J. (2022). Systematic Review Training Model for Education Librarians: A Case Study. The New Review of Academic Librarianship, 28(2), 205-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2020.1784761

Ramirez, D., Foster, M. J., Kogut, A., & Xiao, D. (2022, September). Adherence to systematic review standards: Impact of librarian involvement in Campbell Collaboration’s education reviews. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(5), 102567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102567

Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803

Slebodnik, M., Pardon, K., & Hermer, J. (2022). Who’s publishing systematic reviews? An examination beyond the health sciences. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 101. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2671